On
a cold Friday night in March, a young Japanese-American attorney
walks the streets of Portland trying to get arrested. He gives
his name to a cop. “Run along home, sonny boy,” the
cop says, “before you get into trouble.” This is
exactly what the young man wants. He goes to the police station,
flashes some papers, and is thrown into the drunk tank for
the weekend.
The
year is 1942. The young man is Minoru Yasui, and he’s
out to test the constitutionality of a curfew that has just
been imposed on all people of Japanese ancestry on the West
Coast.
Good
Citizen follows Yasui’s story, placing it in context
with the political and personal upheaval that marked America’s
treatment of Japanese-American citizens during World War
II. The chain of events that begins this night will reach
the Supreme Court and affect four decades of civil rights
debate and legislation. More immediately, it will reverberate
in a national policy that imprisons 70,000 U.S. citizens – men,
women, and children – without due process.
Good
Citizen takes audiences into an FBI interrogation room
where Yasui is questioned about his patriotism, into a Portland
courtroom for his trial, into the Portland jail cell where
he cools his heels for 9 months awaiting disposition of his
case, and finally to the Supreme Court itself. As we experience
Yasui’s story, we also share the greater story of what
was called “exclusion.” We learn how families
had four days to settle their lives and pack only the belongings
they could carry; we travel to the Portland livestock center,
where
temporary living quarters were built in converted stables
and where several thousand families were confined for months
of waiting. Finally, we board a slow train to Minidoka, a
tarpaper city of barbed wire and guard towers in a desolate
part of Idaho, where internees would stay until the last
months of the war.
Good
Citizen is based on contemporary accounts and original
documents, and is in part courtroom drama, using the transcript
of Yasui’s Portland trial. The play employs a variety
of approaches, including direct address by historical figures
(FDR, Supreme Court justices), invented dialog based on actual
accounts, scenes imagining meetings that didn’t take
place, even a surreal TV game show, “Who’s Sorry
Now?” The narrative is connected by found and created
poetry, some composed by internees (and attributed to them),
some by the playwright.
One short scene, in which internees
get their first view of their camp, is composed completely
in haiku, reflecting the poignancy, dignity, and humor that
reside in both the people and the haiku form.
Today
the policies and actions that led to internment are regarded
as racist and unconstitutional, a black spot on America’s
prosecution of the war on the home front. They have even been
linked to a subversion of the
justice system. Yet some of the laws that fed the actions remain
on the books, continuing to provide cover for violations of
the rights of U.S. citizens that occur today.